<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Investment Policy Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investmentpolicy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investmentpolicy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 12/30/11. Which part of &#8220;Total Public Debt Outstanding&#8221; do they not understand? by Rich Sheiman</title>
		<link>http://investmentpolicy.com/2011/12/30/123011-which-part-of-total-public-debt-outstanding-do-they-not-understand/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Sheiman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentpolicy.com/?p=61#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scary stuff

Are our 300 million so daft that they dont recognize our debt crisis? I would think that watching riots in the streets of Greece and Italians bracing for severe austerity measures would command our people&#039;s attention. What is the #1 issue in Obama goes toe to toe with Gingrich or Romney? We are fortunate as a nation to have fear mongering and wars in our rear view mirror. Of course the big focus will be on how to stimulate the economy. The conventional wisdom is that Obama wins if the economy continues to grow as it is at this very moment - he loses if our sluggish recovery falters. That is a remarkable short term prism for looking at our nation&#039;s  fundamental and systemic problems. Yes - economic growth is very important. But economies are cyclical. Always have been - always will be. While certain components of our national income statement are tied to where the economy sits across any calendar year - the vast majority of our balancing act is fixed. A huge part of that equation is out mounting national debt and the associated interest obligations. We cannot just keep raising the ceiling - that is lunacy and any one who is paying attention knows it. Heres hoping we get some fiery moderators who frame the right questions in the upcoming Presidential debates. We need real strategies to material reduce our federal debt. Now. 

I have heard some proposals that would actually stem the tide. 

For example - making Americans recognize the health insurance benefits provided by their employers as income would raise Billions. Running my own company - I am effectively already paying that tax. Fortunately - my 3 FTEs enjoy health coverage through their spouse&#039;s employer. This proposal is just another tax and should not be one of our tactics.

Another proposal is to eliminate the write off for the interest portion of homeowner&#039;s mortgage payments. Wow. One of the biggest current problems with our economy is the hangover from our residential housing boom. New home construction must recover to help create jobs and sustain our economic growth. Killing incentives for home ownership would be a big mistake.

None of the new taxes or austerity measures are pretty - but something must be done. Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it. 

I realize this is an over simplification - but the root solution needs to be extending the retirement age. Productive workers need to quit daydreaming about 62 or even 70. Go to work as long as you have the mental and physical ability to do so - and stop using the word &#039;entitlement&#039;. Nobody in the world is entitled to anything anymore]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary stuff</p>
<p>Are our 300 million so daft that they dont recognize our debt crisis? I would think that watching riots in the streets of Greece and Italians bracing for severe austerity measures would command our people&#8217;s attention. What is the #1 issue in Obama goes toe to toe with Gingrich or Romney? We are fortunate as a nation to have fear mongering and wars in our rear view mirror. Of course the big focus will be on how to stimulate the economy. The conventional wisdom is that Obama wins if the economy continues to grow as it is at this very moment &#8211; he loses if our sluggish recovery falters. That is a remarkable short term prism for looking at our nation&#8217;s  fundamental and systemic problems. Yes &#8211; economic growth is very important. But economies are cyclical. Always have been &#8211; always will be. While certain components of our national income statement are tied to where the economy sits across any calendar year &#8211; the vast majority of our balancing act is fixed. A huge part of that equation is out mounting national debt and the associated interest obligations. We cannot just keep raising the ceiling &#8211; that is lunacy and any one who is paying attention knows it. Heres hoping we get some fiery moderators who frame the right questions in the upcoming Presidential debates. We need real strategies to material reduce our federal debt. Now. </p>
<p>I have heard some proposals that would actually stem the tide. </p>
<p>For example &#8211; making Americans recognize the health insurance benefits provided by their employers as income would raise Billions. Running my own company &#8211; I am effectively already paying that tax. Fortunately &#8211; my 3 FTEs enjoy health coverage through their spouse&#8217;s employer. This proposal is just another tax and should not be one of our tactics.</p>
<p>Another proposal is to eliminate the write off for the interest portion of homeowner&#8217;s mortgage payments. Wow. One of the biggest current problems with our economy is the hangover from our residential housing boom. New home construction must recover to help create jobs and sustain our economic growth. Killing incentives for home ownership would be a big mistake.</p>
<p>None of the new taxes or austerity measures are pretty &#8211; but something must be done. Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it. </p>
<p>I realize this is an over simplification &#8211; but the root solution needs to be extending the retirement age. Productive workers need to quit daydreaming about 62 or even 70. Go to work as long as you have the mental and physical ability to do so &#8211; and stop using the word &#8216;entitlement&#8217;. Nobody in the world is entitled to anything anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10/22/11 &#8211; Perusing a Times “Wealth” Section (with help from Gerry Jonas). by Rich Sheiman</title>
		<link>http://investmentpolicy.com/2011/10/22/102211-perusing-a-times-%e2%80%9cwealth%e2%80%9d-section-with-help-from-gerry-jonas/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Sheiman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentpolicy.com/?p=59#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitting here about a full generation behind you Malcolm - my experience flipping through Times &#039;reporting&#039; on wealth management yields a similar but slightly different experience. I get the McLuhan notion but what tips the balance for me - and perhaps many others from my age group - is a time tested suspicion of financial managers.  I just see a bunch of argyle sweaters and glaringly white teeth as I flip the page in search of something worth reading or even looking at. The stock market has traded sideways for the past 10 years. There are no safe havens for long term investing. Not even gold - unless you know how to buy old gold coins with better numismatic wisdom than the seller. My game plan is to invest in things I can touch and try to pick those investments based on something I think I know and can play a direct hand in over time. That playbook is taking me into commercial real estate in my own town.  I also invest in my own business as an entrepreneur - a catch 22 in that if I dont make a profit I lack the means to buy property. When I retire - if my plan succeeds -  I can sell off these hard assets and convert them into cash. Some people my age dont have the investing options that I am describing here. Better to create them if you can - because just parking your hard earned money in the stock market as a retirement strategy is not going to buy you that yacht - or even in dinghy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitting here about a full generation behind you Malcolm &#8211; my experience flipping through Times &#8216;reporting&#8217; on wealth management yields a similar but slightly different experience. I get the McLuhan notion but what tips the balance for me &#8211; and perhaps many others from my age group &#8211; is a time tested suspicion of financial managers.  I just see a bunch of argyle sweaters and glaringly white teeth as I flip the page in search of something worth reading or even looking at. The stock market has traded sideways for the past 10 years. There are no safe havens for long term investing. Not even gold &#8211; unless you know how to buy old gold coins with better numismatic wisdom than the seller. My game plan is to invest in things I can touch and try to pick those investments based on something I think I know and can play a direct hand in over time. That playbook is taking me into commercial real estate in my own town.  I also invest in my own business as an entrepreneur &#8211; a catch 22 in that if I dont make a profit I lack the means to buy property. When I retire &#8211; if my plan succeeds &#8211;  I can sell off these hard assets and convert them into cash. Some people my age dont have the investing options that I am describing here. Better to create them if you can &#8211; because just parking your hard earned money in the stock market as a retirement strategy is not going to buy you that yacht &#8211; or even in dinghy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Joe Diamond</title>
		<link>http://investmentpolicy.com/about/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Diamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialsecuritywatch.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should have done this before--but please add me to your subscription list.  Your pieces are cogent and most informative.
                             Joe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have done this before&#8211;but please add me to your subscription list.  Your pieces are cogent and most informative.<br />
                             Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

